|
| |
|
FAQs about Deep Sand Beds & Substrate Size
Related Articles: Deep Sand Beds, Marine
Substrates, Live Sand, Biological
Filtration, Biominerals in Seawater,
Understanding
Calcium & Alkalinity, Nitrates in Marine
Aquariums,
Related FAQs: DSBs 1,
DSBs 2, DSBs
3, DSBs 4, DSBs 5,
DSBs 6,
DSBs 7, & FAQs on:
Rationale/Use,
Dangers,
Physical Make-Up, Biological Make-Up,
Location, Depth,
Conversion to/from,
Maintenance/Replacing/Adding To,
& Live Sand
FAQs, FAQs
2, Live Sand 3,
Identification,
Selection/DIY,
Systems/Placement,
Biota, Maintenance,
& Marine
Substrates, Mud Filtration 1, Live
Sand, Plenums, Nitrates
in Marine Aquariums,
Refugium Substrates/DSBs,
|
The bigger the better... but no minimum, matching value... Just too many
other factors to place in a string of variables in such an equation...
foods, feeding, lighting... chemistry... temperature.. |
Big Tanks Need Big DSBs – 06/30/07
Hello,
<<Hi There>>
My main display tank is around 900-gallons.
<<Neat!>>
My Nitrates have shot up lately, to 50+.
<<Not so neat…>>
I have set up a 7-inch deep DSB in my refugium tank. It is 23-inches x 16-inches
in surface area, with the other half of the refugium live rock.
<<This is a start, but you need much more here for this large and likely
well-stocked system>>
Is this a big enough DSB for my system or should I have more?
<<If you have the capacity, definitely go larger>>
I do have another 50-gallon tank connected to the system, which I could also use
if I have to.
<<Indeed do this, and add another if you have the space for it. You could even
use plastic trash cans/storage containers for this purpose. The more the better
in my opinion. As an example… I have a somewhat smaller system with a 375-gallon
display. I have 1,000 lbs of sugar-fine Aragonite in the display and another 300
lbs of this material in a 55-gallon in-line dedicated vegetable refugium. I’m a
firm believer in the DSB methodology>>
My clown trigger is getting some white spot although my other fish are fine,
probably stress from the nitrates.
<<Possibly, yes>>
How long does a DSB take to have any effect?
<<A DSB should start providing “some” benefit fairly quickly (say about a week),
but will take a bit of time (weeks to months) to realize its full potential (can
be helped along by obtaining/adding a few cups of substrate from fellow
hobbyists/your LFS). Though with the small DSB (in relation to tank size) you
have now, you may not notice much improvement other than a possible
slowing/stabilization of Nitrates…if that>>
I have ordered another skimmer (Bubble King) so that will help as well.
<<Beautiful skimmers…but, is your current skimmer not doing its job?…or maybe
simply not “big” enough?>>
I'm doing 105-gallon water changes once a week as that is about as fast as I can
make my water.
<<Unless this system is “very much” overstocked I would think this to be
sufficient…the answer to your Nitrate issues is likely to be found elsewhere>>
I have recently started using Ozone, can this cause Nitrates?
<<Not that I am aware… Randy Holmes-Farley has written some excellent pieces
about Ozone usage (and so much more) in the hobby; do have a look on Reef
Central at his archived articles in the Reef Chemistry forum>>
Have to ask.
<<Understood>>
One more thing, should I also get an Aqua Medic nr5000 nitrate reducer to help
things along?
<<This could prove beneficial. But these Nitrate reduction units seem too
“fiddly” to me…would much rather put my stock in a large DSB>>
All the big systems around here are using them but they do cost, an additional
mV control and probe is needed.
<<Yes, pricey bits of gear>>
I will do anything for my fish so if you recommend them then I will have to part
with the cash.
<<Mmm, perhaps as a “last-ditch” effort… Add as large a DSB (even multiple
containers re) as you can and see how things proceed…I would even consider
putting a macroalgae (Chaetomorpha gets my vote for its “user-friendliness”) in
the vessels over the DSB for some additional organics removal…with all lighted
on a reverse-daylight schedule. I would also add Poly-Filter to your filter
flow-path or in a large canister filter to pull down those Nitrates>>
Oh well, I enjoy it so much.
<<Indeed>>
Thanks for the help again.
<<Quite welcome…hope you find it useful>>
When I see people in shops struggling for information, I just pass them a bit of
paper with your website on it, boy do they thank me when they see me next.
<<Ahh!…a strong endorsement indeed, and is redeeming to know>>
Kind Regards,
James
<<James, I would be most interested to hear how you proceed/things
progress…please do send me an update if you find the time. Eric Russell>>
|
|
 |
DSB - Minimum DSB Height, Minimum Water Height, and Natural Sunlight.
4/6/07
Hi guys, it's Jason here from Makati, Philippines.
<Hi Jason, Mich here in the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania.>
The city here is eerily quiet because it's a religious holiday over here today.
<Religious holiday here today also, but is always quiet.>
I'm still thinking and re-designing my refuge.
<It is good to plan as much as possible.>
The things I do know is that I definitely want a DSB, some Chaeto, and that I
want my tank to be displayed (not just another sump in the dark).
<OK.>
I've been reading thru your FAQ's and have been trying to find what the minimum
depth for a DSB should be before it starts to lose effect. It seems that 5" of
all sugar fine sand is deep enough. No longer going to use a layer of crushed
coral. Perhaps just some pieces here and there.
<Sounds good.>
Also, what is the minimum water column height you suggest? Would this be 5
inches as well?
<No, does not need not be this deep. You need enough to keep the surface of the
sand wet.>
The current design I'm thinking about is the minimum DSB with a minimum water
column length, with but have a longer length, perhaps 36" ..
<Ok.>
I also wanted to place this refuge in front of my window where it gets strong
natural light in the morning. Is this advisable/ok? Do I run any risk of algae
blooms?
<Lot of variables here, but may be OK. Natural sunlight is commonly used in
many large aquariums.>
Hope you guys are doing great!
<Doing fine, thank you! -Mich>
Jason
DSB size 1/2 Tank volume enough for NNR? YES!!! 1/2/07
I have a question about creating a DSB.
<I'll take a shot at it! Graham here.>
My system is a 220 gal FOWLR. Currently have wet/dry, Coralife protein skimmer
and UV sterilizer. Tank also has about a 150 lbs of live rock that I put in
about 2 years ago.
<OK...>
I am considering adding a DSB, but do not want to put the sand in the main
tank. If I use a separate tank, does the floor area need to be the same as the
main tank? For example, my main tank is 2" X 6" of floor area. Will a DSB in a
smaller tank still work? Like maybe a 2' X 3' tank with 6" of sand in
it....will that work? My purpose for this is NNR.
<The setup you describe sounds quite adequate, as it is roughly 1/2 the volume
of your display. Here's a good read for you:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/dsbsize.htm (And it can be found by typing "DSB
SIZE" in the google search tool). Tip: Using this tool shortens the time it
takes for you to get answers you need.>
Thanks in advance for the help.
<You're welcome, as long as I helped!>
Scott
<-Graham T.>
Re: Switching to a larger tank & DSB q's 1/03/07
Graham,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
<Welcome.>
I have read the article in question about DSB setup and just wanted a little
clarification. I would like to setup the DSB in the refugium 4"-5" deep of
sugar fine sand and use the same sand except 1" or less for the display. The
reasoning for this in the display is that I have used larger grained sands
before and know how easily detritus gets built up in the gaps.
<Understood, though this size is still useful for it's beneficial species
hosting properties. >
Also, my tank is going to be only 20" tall and wanted to have as much area top
to bottom as possible.
<I agree on this point.>
I would like to accomplish both NNR and food culturing in the refugium. It
looked like the article was saying one way or the other was better but I know
I've seen them set up with LR, algae, and the DSB all included.
<Yup, but did you see it work?>
I just wanted to know the best route to take knowing the tank style I'm working
on is a FOWLR slowly working towards a reef setup.
<Not sure there really is a *best* route to take here. With this sort of thing
in my own setup, I trust myself to find a way. Experiment with just the sand for
NNR and add some LR later. Remember your own stated goal: NNR, with a possible
move toward reef later.>
For the sump/refugium setup, yes I am planning on getting a 20-30 gal (hopefully
a 30 but we'll see) and using silicone to put in acrylic baffles to split it
into 3 sections. What would be the best way to order the sections as far as
water to the skimmer, fuge, and then return or is there a better order of flow.
<No, you have the idea I usually find most profitable. Your skimmer removes
organics that are attracted to the surface tension between air and water. (Hence
the bubbles? I knew that Graham, where are you going with this?) Guess where
there's another mechanism similar to the protein-skimmer's interior? The surface
of your tank! Your surface skimmer should be feeding directly to the protein
skimmer for the most direct route to the organic-trapping bubbles.>
I have read about other people doing this but if you have another suggestion any
advice is appreciated. Do you have any thoughts about my question on switching
to the new tank and setting everything up immediately? I'm not sure if I should
set the refugium/sump up and running with the display right away or let it cycle
alone.
<The refugium isn't a separate system, and therefore won't need to be "cycled"
in the normal sense. You obviously will need to give it a chance to "setup"
before it does the job(s) you have in mind, but there is no reason I can think
of to cycle it. (BOB, interject if I'm off-base.)>
If I have to cycle the fuge/sump is it the same as cycling a tank even though I
would use new sand and cured rock or would you suggest live sand for the
fuge? Would that be the reason to cycle it? Also have read different opinions
about the use of live rock or not in the refugium. Like I mentioned I am
worried about recycling the tank when I add in the fuge setup, new sand, and the
new rock I am getting even with keeping all the old water and LR.
<I'm not sure why... maybe I'm missing something, (or I'm just rushed on my
lunch break ;) but I see so reason to be worried about the cycle. Maybe you
should brush up on the cycling FAQs we have available here?>
OK so maybe it's more than a little clarification but I don't have any LFS that
I trust or anyone else with a marine setup that I talk to on a regular basis.
<There you go, now I'm blushing!>
Thanks again for the advice.
<Again, you are welcome Jeremy. *BUT* do try to read every bit of the FAQs here
on a topic or a related topic before "bugging" me. J/K, but there are some
simple explanations to Protein skimming and fuge setup here that will enlighten
you.>
Jeremy
<-Graham T.>
Creating a Deeper sand Bed! 9/23/05
Hi Bob,
<Hey there! Scott F. here tonight!>
Thanks for your speedy reply to all my questions in the past. I find this site
the most informative tool on the net (really I do)!
<Glad to hear that! We certainly enjoy bringing it to you!>
Anyways, to get going, I've been looking into making my sandbed a bit deeper. I
have a 100g reef with 150lbs of medium grit LS in the 1.0-2.0mm range at about
on average, 3 inches deep. I made a mistake in adding 20lbs of oolitic LS to it
a couple of months ago, is this harmful?
<I don't see any real problems with that.>
The reason why I say, "on average 3 inches" is because I have this annoying
maroon clown that has been raised without an anemone, she likes to shimmy in the
sand causing a major disturbance in the bed.
<An unavoidable Clownfish behavior!>
I have a BTA that she has been hosting in for several months... but old habits
are hard to break. My question is, I would like to achieve a 6" bed. Is my grit
too big?
<Well, it is a good size if you're looking at a 4"-6" sandbed depth, as this
slightly larger grain size does require a greater depth on the average than the
finer stuff to foster denitrification.>
Also, if I go "deep", should I get rid of the Clown (very beautiful, if she
wasn't so pretty she'd be out of there) so that the DSB would remain
undisturbed?
<A tough call...It is best if the deeper (greater than the top inch or so)
layers are left undisturbed. If you really want to have an undisturbed DSB, the
Clown may need to be removed.>
Right now I'm getting nitrogen gas bubbles in the sediment... should I tamper?
<I wouldn't tamper with it, lest you disturb the very processes that you're
trying to encourage.>
Do what you do best,
Missy
<Rock on, Missy! I think you're on the right track here! Regards, Scott F.>
Question on DSBs 1/27/06
Hello Crew,
<Jennica>
I've read your Reef Invertebrates book. The book and your website
appears to -very- strongly recommend using sugar-fine sand (e.g., like
CaribSea Aragamax sugar sand), but the reference chart at CaribSea
(http://www.carib-sea.com/media/aquatic/reference.jpg)
gives these
sizes only a "G" rating at best for use in deep sand beds. Only the
grains the next size step up earn the "E" rating. Do you know why
that is?
<Mmm, nope>
I'd really love to pursue a DSB not just for the
denitrification, but also for the opportunity to watch interesting
creepy crawly critters in action.
Regards,
JJ
<Do contact CaribSea here... and make known what they say. Thanks. Bob
Fenner>
Re: Question on DSBs 1/31/06
Hello Crew,
<Jennica>
Per correspondence below, I emailed CaribSea regarding their "Good" grading for
the sugar-sized Aragamax sand as opposed to "Excellent".
This is their response:
"It was simply an oversight while creating the new catalog, and website. It will
be changed to excellent in the updated versions."
Thought you'd might like to know.
Regards,
Jennica
<Ahh! Thank you very much for this follow-up... Seems the folks putting the
catalog together made up a classification scheme but forgot to revisit and put
"real" (relatable prompts) in its place before sending to the printer. Bob
Fenner>
DSB layered sizes - 2/21/2006
Hey guys, First I want to thank you all for the great information on the
site. It is truly invaluable. I have a question regarding a DSB in a 24 gallon
nano tank. I have used a 4-8" DSB in my 75 gallon reef tank for over a year (I
know that's a big difference, the current has done lots of shaping). I used
Aragamax "Select Grade", and the nitrates are undetectable. Needless to say I am
very happy with it. So this is my question, I am starting up a 24 gallon AquaPod
(I hope these ones don't crack!) at work to keep part of my reef with me all
day. My LFS does not carry the Aragamax "Select Grade" that I used for my first
DSB. They do have the "Special Grade" which is still pretty fine, but not sugar
fine. They advertise the Special Grade as 1-1.7mm. Is this Ok to use, or should
I wait until I can get the true "oolitic" size?
<I would use either... the one on hand is fine>
I was thinking that I could put down 3" of the "Special", and then maybe 1" on
top of that using the "Select" I have some select left over). I can also get a
"super fine" 0.2 to 1.22 mm, I was worried that may be too small. What do you
think?
Thanks, Jeremy
<If mixed, will mix... Bob Fenner>
Small Refugium DSB - 07/26/06
I made a 5 gallon refugium that sits behind my main tank, a ten gallon, with
the goals of nutrient export, pod production, pH stability and increased water
volume.
<<Excellent>>
I was planning on putting Chaetomorpha, live rock rubble, and some sand in this
refugium and running it on a reverse photoperiod.
<<Okay>>
My question is would I see any benefits from a deep sand bed in this size
refugium (the sand area's footprint would be 5"X15") or would I be better of
with a shallow sand bed and more water volume?
<<Everything is relative my friend...considering the small size of the display,
this particular DSB could indeed provide some benefit>>
Thanks a lot for any help you can give me.
Eli
<<Is my pleasure to assist. Regards, EricR>>
DSB Size/Depth - 08/29/06
Hi again,
<<Hello>>
I am trying to add a DSB for my 125 FOWLR due to a persistent nitrate problem.
<<Ok>>
I do have sand in the main display at present but due to the home improvements
done by my fish on a regular basis the SB is 2-3" in some spots and much less in
most others. (Apparently they don't understand the benefits and keep moving it
around when I try to fix it.)
<<Ha!...indeed>>
Be that as it may, how big of a sump/refugium and how deep of a SB would be an
appropriate remote DSB?
<<In my opinion...As large a vessel as you can practically employ, with a
"minimum" 6-inches of sugar-fine aragonite>>
I also have close to 200lbs of LR in the system. Thanks again for all your
help.
Mordy
<<Regards, EricR>>
DSB Materials - More Questions
>Marina,
>>Hello Dan.
>Assuming the mineral analysis from the quarry shows acceptable levels of
undesirable compounds, I'm going to try the limestone, but I'll have to screen
it once to get the desired maximum particle size, then again to screen out the
pieces that are too small. What should my max and min particle size goals be?
>>I've actually seen DSBs with rather large particles (one DSB which was working
*very* well had fine gravel sized particles - over 3mm), as well as those that
could only be called silt. I wouldn't worry too much about screening out small
sizes, let water movement handle that, nor large except for aesthetics. 1mm-3mm
is what I'd call "standard", though I can't say it's written in stone (no pun
intended).
>Of course, I plan to wash it thoroughly, soak it in clean water with frequent
changes until the pH is stable at 9.0 or less (according to WWM) before slowly
introducing it into the aquarium. Dan
>>You're on the right track, and unless the limestone is heavily occluded with
other materials, doubtful if it's being quarried (I assume for building), then I
suspect it should come back with pretty good results. Marina
- DSB Grain Size -
Hi Guys,
I have a quick question about substrate selection for a DSB. I plan on putting
5+ inches into a 125G aquarium. I see that there are two sugar fine substrates
from CaribSea . Their standard oolitic sand has grain sizes of 0.2 to
1.22mm. They also have a more expensive oolitic “select” with grain sizes of
0.5 to 1.02mm. Is there a difference in performance that justifies the
difference in price? <I'm not aware of one, but would think the higher price is
just due to extra processing.> I don’t want to spend more than I have to, but I
don’t want to cause myself grief over a few bucks either. <Think you'll do just
fine with the standard oolitic sand.>
Thanks for your help and keep up the good work.
Larry
<Cheers, J -- >
Deep Sand bed questions - 1/23/04
Thank you for your great web site and great book! <Thanks for purchasing
the book and reading here> My question is, if I use 8 inches of Carib sea
Tahitian moon black sand in my main tank will I get the benefits of a live DSB,
or is the sand just too coarse to get an NNR effect? <Nope. Will be fine>
Will I end up with a big mess because of trapped detritus in this sand? <Just
use a baster to put the detritus in circulation before a water change> I
don't have to use the sand if it is going to cause problems, I just really like
the look of a dark substrate. <No worries> I also have a refugium that has
the capacity to put as much as 1ft of Carib sea Aragamax sugar fine sand in it.
The refugium is 4ftL 2ft wide and 20 inches tall. Is there a point of
diminishing returns when it comes to sand beds? <Possible but not much
scientific evidence to prove such as of yet. I hear Bob Toonen is working on
some science and sandbed stuff. Look for it soon> Is it best to have the sand
base as deep as possible or is there a limit where you start going in the wrong
direction. <As stated above but you could look/see here for all kinds of
information on DSBs: http://www.wetwebmedia.com/deepsandbeds.htm>
Also, before this tank there is another tank that will hold a mud/algae refugium
that is the same dimensions. How deep should the mud be? <3-5 inches> Is
there a point of diminishing returns with mud as well? I believe same as
above> I am also going to be using live rock, protein skimming, a calcium
reactor, a sump sponge that I rinse out daily, and a canister carbon filter that
I turn on from time to time when needed. The water will flow through the sump in
this order, first to the protein skimmer, then through a sump sponge to a
chamber with the carbon filter, then into the mud/algae refugium, then into the
deep sand bed refugium, then into a tank with the calcium reactor, then back to
the main tank. I put the carbon and sump sponge before the refugiums because I
don't want to filter out any beneficial organisms. <Exactly> I figure If I
am cycling all the water in my tank 10 times an hour they should still be able
to have an effect on water clarity where they are. Let me know if I am wrong in
this thinking. A Final question, my tank is a 140 gallon 48.5 x 24.5 x 28.5., My
lighting is 2 250 watt halide bulbs, one 10,000k one 65,000k <You mean to say
6500K> and 4 95 watt compact florescent 03 actinics. Given that I will have a
8 inch DSB the light penetration of the water will now be 20.5in instead of
27in. The lights are suspended 1ft above the open air tank. <Too high. I
would keep them around 6-8 inches if possible> In this tank I will want to
keep anemones, corals, clams etc.. I would list the species but I haven't
decided just yet. <Then I would go with two 400W MH's if possible or some
mixture if it is financially possible> Should I go with the 250 watt halides
or the 175 watt. The fixtures are very expensive so I want to go with the choice
that offers the greatest latitude. <then 250s it is> The substrate will be
black as well as the back of the aquarium, which I know absorbs allot of light.
<~Paul>
Thank You,
Greg Kirton
DSB and light cycle ?? 3/13/04
I would like an expert opinion please. Thought you folks might lead
me in the right direction.
<Adam here today, and I will certainly try!>
I am planning a 400 gallon mix reef/fish tank 96x30x36 tall. I would
like a fair amount of fish with plenty of open space for
swimming. For circulation I am planning a Amp Master 3000 for return
and 4 Tunze streams to get me in that 10-20 times turnover zone or
greater. With that much water movement and the fair amount of fish
waste produced can I still use the fine sugar grain sand bed in the
display? I am afraid I will have a sand storm if I really turn
up the Tunze streams and my other concern is that the DSB will not keep up the
fish waste pollution. I have heard of DSB failure due to overstocking
with fish. I do not plan to over stock, but plan to have a fair
amount of fish. Need your opinion if a refugium based DSB would be
best in my situation. I also plan to do 10 gallon weekly water
changes and use a Euro-reef 12-2 skimmer. If I have the room I wanted
to run reverse lighting Gracilaria/Chaetomorpha fuges too.
<You could still use the fine sand, but you may have to finesse the current
devices so that they don't blow directly onto the sand. You will also
have to secure them well so that they can't be redirected by coming lose or
being dislodged by snails or other inverts. A healthy, very alive
sandbed should handle any reasonable bioload, particularly with the other
methods you plan on employing. A remote sand bed/refugium is worth
considering, but you will have to be very conscious of detritus accumulation in
the display. If you have a fine DSB in the display, brittle stars and
sea cucumbers will do a lot of that work for you. FWIW, I would aim
closer to 10% weekly water changes rather than 10 gallon!>
If I went to a refugium DSB how big of an area do you think I would need for
good nitrate reduction for this size tank? Also.....if I go refugium
DSB what specific grade sand and depth would work best in the display
tank. I want to produce a lot of copepods/amphipods somewhere in the
system for my fishes with medium course sand like CaribSea special
reef. Could this be accomplished with a 1/2 or less med-course sand
in the display? Need your suggestions please.
<Ironically, I have found that CaribSea's "special grade reef sand"
is the least reef tank suitable sand they produce, and is only useful for aesthetics. Use
a coarser substrate (crushed coral or Puka shells) to encourage pod populations
and finer (oolitic, Southdown, sugar fine) for nitrate
reduction. Each of these must be managed. DSB's must be
kept "lively", and caution must be used that coarse substrates don't
accumulate detritus. A remote DSB 1/3-1/2 the area of the display
should be adequate for nitrate reduction and should provide plenty of growing
space for macroalgae.>
For lighting I was contemplating 6 hr on-off cycles. I live near the
desert in CA and could keep my lights off during the hottest part of the day
with this cycle. I have heard of people do this with fish
ok....but is it ok with corals too.
<I would suggest that you have some light on throughout the entire
photoperiod. You could reserve your most intense lighting for a few
hours in the morning and a few hours in the evening to ameliorate heat
issues.>
That's all for now. Thanks!<Best Regards. Adam>
DSB
Hi all! Another question here! After doing some searching I can't seem to
find an answer. In my 46 gallon bowfront I have 24lbs. of CaribSea Live
aragonite. After reading your site I wish I didn't. However I did so that's it.
What I'm wondering is if I wanted to do a DSB of 3" should I layer some
fine sand above it or go with a larger size, CaribSea 1-2mm. ? Would this cause
more problems? Thanx again for all the help! Eileen :)<I prefer the 1-2mm
CaribSea, but that is just my personal preference, good luck, IanB>
Mistakes, Or Innovations?
Hello everyone, I love the info. you all have been providing, it has saved
me from making mistakes, thanks.
<We're very happy to be of help to you! Scott F. at the keyboard today>
I have been reading DSB FAQ's for the last two days and I now have a couple of
Q's of my own. I think I should have visited your site sooner in regards to this
subject. I don't know why I didn't, brain fart :). Hopefully it will be less
flatulent in the future:).
<I won't touch that one...I could. But I won't! >
Anyways, I bought and placed Carib Sea Aragonite ( I think it was Sea Floor
Special) in my new 125 gal. corner show tank. It didn't have the particle size
on the bag any where but it looked to be no more than 1mm in size. I know it
isn't sugar fine or oolitic. It does have many other smaller sized particles in
it ranging from what looks to be sugar fine all the way up to 1mm. I was under
the understanding that a range in sand size (from sugar size to 1mm) was good to
have because the different critters that will eventually be in their need
different sizes. Each species needing a particular size in order to survive. So
if there is a range in sand size the DSB will be able to support a large
diversity of species. True?
<I believe that it will>
Then I read, after placing this sand in to the tank, the DSB FAQ's on this web
site and sugar fine seems to be the size that best be suited for a DSB and
particle sizes shouldn't be mixed.
<Well, there is a lot of thought and controversy on this matter. Yes, an all
oolithic sugar-fine aragonite is ideal, but mixing grades of smaller-grain sands
is also useful, IMO. I've done this in deep sand beds before with great results.
However, you don't want to mix grades that are too dissimilar, as this can
result in lots of compaction and channeling, potentially reducing the efficiency
of the bed. Finer grades are useful for assisting with buffering and releasing
bio-minerals into the water.>
I had also added live sand samples to help seed my current sand bed from
reputable LFS's. Since my sand bed is already mixed should I go ahead and fill
it with the same material I have started with or should I fill the remaining
2" ( I'm going for a 5" DSB) with sugar fine sand to increase its
numbers in the DSB?
<I'd continue with the same material at this point.>
Next Q. I know that certain sand sifters eat DSB critters, I understand why this
is bad and I'm not going to use them, but I have also herd that when sand
sifters are sifting they are also destroying the tubes/burrows, that these DSB
animals make. In doing so, they are restricting good water flow through the DSB
that aids in the denitrification process and filtration and that this
destruction is not a good thing. The DSB should be left undisturbed by all
except for the DSB animals and only they should do the sifting. Yes, No?
<I would say an unqualified yes. I believe that you don't want animals that
are too aggressive in their sandbed movements. Even in regular maintenance, the
hobbyist should not disturb anything but the top layer of sand, IMO>
My 125 gal came with two wet/dry filters attached in the overflow box. They are
filled with bio balls, should I replace these all together and put carbon filter
pads in their place? My new tank has only been running for 4 or 5 days.
<Personally, I'd dump the bioballs altogether, and let the sand bed and live
rock do the "filtering" in your tank>
My sump is a plastic barrel cut in 1/2 and holds 40 gal. The reason for its
addition was because we could not get the pump to stop leaking at the threaded
pipe attachments. We were going to add a sump any way. We needed something that
would keep the leak contained and it was the best option from what we had to
choose from.
<A great improve move, IMO!>
I know it isn't the most desirable shape but it's what we have to work with for
the time being. I wanted to put a DSB made up of sugar fine sand in the sump.
I was thinking of attaching PVC to the inlet hose and have the PVC go
all of the way around the inside of the barrel with little holes in it pointed
towards the sand. Would this diffuse the water enough so that it wouldn't
destroy the DSB?
<It probably will. I'm afraid that you'll have to experiment with this. You
can always dial down the flow if too disruptive>
Would it provide enough current to prevent dead spots or any other harmful
scenarios? If this is a good idea, should I place the pvc on top of the sand or
just enough above it for adequate (non-destructive) circulation?
<I think it will work. I'd place the return just above for maximum
efficiency>
Almost done:) I have seen some F/O and reef tanks with a little macro algae
purposefully planted in there. Some looked like grass the other was green and
broad leafed. It looked really nice but should it be done? Or, should all
algae's be kept in the fuge?
<Your call. As long as you can manage the growth of the macroalgae, and as
long as they don't overrun other sessile life forms, there is no reason not to
include macroalgae in the display.>
Last one, I have rinsed my sand with tap water, I had no other type to use, will
the sand in my tank now be leaching tap water chemicals in to my tank?
<I suppose that it's possible, but I wouldn't lose sleep over this>
I also have some LR in a 50 gal soon to be F/O that had been setting in fresh
water from the tap for 2 mo. It was dead at the time and bleached. I don't know
why I didn't think of this before, duh, but are they now leaching these tap
elements back in to my salt tank?
<Again, probably not a problem>
There is a lot of emerald green micro algae on them, the snails aren't eating
it. I am going to add a fuge in to the system with macro algae, will this
eventually remedy the problem, if there is one, with the element leaching. Or
will the micro algae growing on it now use up these elements?
<Well, it will grow as long as there is "fuel" to use for it's
growth.>
Sorry, I need to buy Phos., ALK., and Calcium test so I can't tell now if that is
what is happening. Ammonia:0, Nitrate:0, Nitrite:0, PH: 8.3, Specific gravity:
1.023, temp. 78-80F DSB 5". Or should I just remove these pieces of LR,
they are coloring up nicely now, red, purple, lots of green.
<I'd leave it in there at this point>
Ok I'm done, so are my hands. Thank you for your time.
Shauna
<My pleasure, Shauna. Feel free to write any time if you have more questions.
Regards, Scott F>
Re: Deep sand beds 4/2/04
Adam, Thank you for the quick response. I am planning on a glass
top to hopefully keep the firefish in the tank.
<Ahhh.... Wise choice. Do keep in mind that this will
greatly reduce light transmission into the tank.>
In your response on different size sand you said one tank should be fine and the
other tank also fine I believe. Did you mean to use sugar size <1mm oolithic
in one and say a 1-2 mm slightly larger grain in the other?
<Ooops! I mis-typed. I meant one should be fine
(oolitic/sugar fine) and one coarse (Puka shells, crushed coral, 3-5mm). The
1-2mm grain size products (like CARIBSEA "special grade reef sand")
don't support any useful life besides bacteria. Critters can burrow
into fine sand or live in the spaces in very coarse sand, but nothing does well
in the in-between grain sizes.>
Also if I did skip the firefish would 2 clown gobies pair up as they are
hermaphroditic or would they have to be purchased as a mated pair? Thanks
again Walt
<It is always better to purchase a pair if possible to be sure of their compatibility. Your
retailer may be willing to put two together to see if they get along. Spawning
of clown gobies is very common in captivity and their partnership/social
behavior makes them a very delightful choice. Best Regards. Adam>
Remote DSB
Hello crew at WWM,
<Hi there! Scott F. with you today!>
I’m a marine newbie…my tank is about 4 months old now…I’m thinking of
adding a sump to my 55g reef/fish tank. The biggest tank I could fit
in my cabinet would be something like a standard 10g tank but about ¾ of the
standard height…so I would probably have around a 5-7 gallon sump. I would
like to add a 4-5” DSB in it. Is that enough area (volume) for NNR
for my 55g tank (around 35-45g of actual water).
<I think that, if you set up the sandbed with a fine oolithic aragonite
product, it can have a very positive effect!>
Tank setup…
55g All-Glass Tank
75lbs base rock (pretty much live now)
2 lbs live rock
220 watts Compact Fluorescent (110w 10k, 110w Actinic)
Red Sea Prizm Protein Skimmer (this skimmer really sucks)
CSL 9 watt UV sterilizer
Magnum 350 deluxe filter
2 PowerSweep powerheads
2 False Perculas
1 Yellow Tang
1 Yellowtail Damsel
1 Dwarf Lion
1 Coral Banded Shrimp
3 Emerald Crabs
around 9 Astrea Snails
around 12 Blue-leg Hermit Crabs
1 pretty much bleached ???? anemone
mushroom corals
button polyps
Pumping Xenia
One Torch Coral Branch – 2 stems
One Hammer Coral Branch – 2 stems
Coralline Algae is just beginning to encrust rock and glass…
Thank You,
Ronald Leguidleguid
<I'd go for it, Ronald! Even a small sandbed can have some very beneficial
results! It is certainly worth the effort! Good luck! Regards, Scott F>
How Much Sand and Filtration for a 1300 Litre Tank?
Hi Guys,
<< and gals, although not here right now >>
I'll be as quick as I can. I do really have to ask these questions as
you are the only people I will listen to. The LFS are no help. My
1300 litre main tank and 500 litre sump have just been delivered.
<< Excellent >>
1) I have read all the DSB FAQs but need a little clarification. I have bought
some aragonite 1mm - 2mm size as I couldn't get sugar fine size (I'm in South
Africa). << I don't like sugar size, so I think you got what you want.
>> My aim would be for natural nitrate reduction. Do I add a
5-6 inch deep sand bed to the main tank or to the sump and how deep
in the sump if so? << I like about 4 inches in the main tank,
and in the sump. >> A DSB in the sump only may be sufficient as I only
have 3
Tangs, Niger trigger, Coris wrasse and a blue ringed angel plus LR and no
corals. << Actually the more corals you have, the less sand you
need, as the corals are helping to filter the water. >> They are all
around 4-5 inches at the moment. I don't plan on adding anymore fish.
In my 300 litre tank which is there current home my nitrate ranges from 0 to 10.
2) Is it better to add 2 x Turboflotor 1000 or 1 x Turboflotor 5000 shortly?
AquaMedic is all that's available here? << Sorry, I'm not familiar with
them. Basically the more filtration and the more water motion the
better. >>
3) If I put a glass cover on top of the tank to stop dust, evaporation etc.
would it not stop oxygen getting in and gas exchange?
<< Yes, and no. A glass cover isn't bad, unless it is like a
tight seal and doesn't allow gas exchange. A better idea is a glass
shield right under the bulbs, but not all the way across the tank. >>
4) I have read sump FAQs as well, but do I add bioballs and those round ceramic
things to begin with, or just more LR? << I would stay away from bioballs,
and just go with more live rock. >>
Thanks so much. I've just been reading the "Goodbye to
Powerheads" article so I'm away to build a water return manifold. My
fish are going to love me for this. I don't know how people can swap
their fish around, I have gotten so attached to mine. << Me too, good
luck. >>
Kind Regards,
James.
<< Blundell >>
What substrate size should I use in my DSB?
Found your site. Read the FAQ's. Still confused, don't want to
make mistake! Am setting up 110X tank for reef community. Propose
100-150 lbs Fiji. LR My concern is the live sand bed, which everyone seems to
have slightly different opinion on. I intend to do a DSB but want it
varied enough to be safe and yet support both small and somewhat larger
micro-crustacean populations. Would I be correct in using @ 60%
Nature's Ocean Aragonite Live Sand (.05-1.0 mm), 20% Medium Grade (1.0 to 2.0mm)
such as CaribSea Seaflor Aragonite, and 20% Coarse grade (2.0-4.0 mm) crushed
coral? These recommendations come from Dr. Shimek and Jonathan Lowrie, with the
addendum that large populations of diverse infauna are a must. << I really
don't think substrate size matters much, but would rather have a mix than a
constant particulate size. Therefore, I like what you are proposing
to use. >> If this is incorrect I would love to know BEFORE I invest in
more sand. I already have 80 Lbs of the Nature's Ocean Live Sand. Please
help! I want my "critters" safe and happy. << I think
this would work well, no worries here, as long as you like the looks of those
substrates. >>
MommaKat
<< Blundell >>
Skimmers and DSBs
Hi Guys,<Hi James, MikeD in Florida here>
Two quick questions.<Sounds easy enough> For my new 1650 litre system of 7
marine fish and LR<400 US gallons? I'm seriously envious, with my largest being
a 1200 litre tank>
only, would it be better to buy 2xturboflotor1000 or 1 x turboflotor5000
shorty? Here in South Africa AquaMedic is the only skimmers available and
the 2 options come out at the same price.<if the cost is the same, I believe I'd
go with the two as the likelihood of both going kaput at the same time is slim,
thus when you eventually do have a problem, you're not under so much pressure to
make instant repairs and the negative impact will be less>
Also, should I put a DSB in the main tank or will one in the sump be
enough?<That largely depends on your sense of esthetics and the type fish that
you are keeping. Wrasses that bury at night, for example have been known to
commit suicide diving into a bare bottom, and likewise many puffers bury at
night.>
If so, how deep a substrate in the main tank?<I run about 6" in my 1200 liter
tank, but by living near the sea, rely on large marine snails and fish safe
crabs to keep it from becoming a detritus trap.>
Many Thanks again,<You're more than welcome.>
James.
Set-up DSB - 7/14/03
Anthony or other crew members:
<a treat tonight... you get me and several of my multiple personalities: one
is a professional wrestler interestingly enough>
I continue to be grateful to you & Bob & the entire crew for all that
you do for this great hobby.
<friends and fellow hobbyists like you are the inspiration. We thank you in
kind!>
I read the FAQs everyday. I love your new book-gave it 5 stars on Amazon.
<wow... gracias! Such feedback on Amazon and abroad really is a big help to
other browsers/buyers... and certainly to the authors <G>>
One piece of advice I liked was related to the importance of supporting the LFS.
I have access to 2 very conscientious & helpful ones here in the Salt Lake
City area (Mountain
Shadow Marine in Centerville and The Aquarium in Sandy).
<ahhh, yes... I know Randy as MSM and like him very well! Will look forward
to meeting the other folks in time>
I always respect a merchant who won't sell you something he doesn't think you're
ready for.
<agreed... it helps the customer, long-term business and the hobby at large.
Kudos to them>
I am working with both of these to expand from my current 80G FOWLR. I have
convinced my wife that this is a good middle-aged expensive hobby-safer than a
Harley and cheaper than an antique fire engine (maybe not by much). Anyway, she
gets a new floor and I get a new tank (not near the new floor).
<all good and agreed :) >
In 2 weeks I will set up a 180G FOWLR circulating with the 80G (eventually to
become a reef) and a 44G upstream refugium. I have already paid for the
All-Glass pre-drilled 180G. Water will be pumped out of drilled hole in the back
of the 180 & split between the 80 & 44, then returned by gravity to the
180. There will also be a 48X20X18 sump under the 180. This will contain a DSB
& algae and a Euro-Reef CS8-2 skimmer (with ozone). It will be lit by power
compacts as recommended by Randy at MSM.
<fine set-up/plans>
Eventual stock:
80G: 1 ocellaris clown, 1 dusky Jawfish, 1 flame angel, 1 Royal Gramma, 1 canary
wrasse, 1 yellow tang, 4 cleaner shrimp
180G: 1 Foxface Rabbitfish, 1 purple tang, 1 bird wrasse, 1 Lemonpeel
angel, 1 majestic angel (5", already in QT, active, eating voraciously, was
thriving at LFS for 6 weeks), and possibly a snowflake eel. No shrimp.
Questions:
1. Does this grouping seem reasonable?
<yep>
2. I want the 44G refugium to be a 'pod farm. I love watching Mysis, 'pods, tiny
brittle stars & other creatures. What DSB substrate is best to get the
greatest variety? Per your book, different sized produce different critters.
Could I make half of it sugar fine and the other half a bit larger?
<no mixing of substrates... and for the larger micro-crustaceans... they will
favor media above the substrate after all. For natural: Chaetomorpha
spaghetti/wire algae (or another like mass)... or artificial... course polyester
pads (like pond filter pads or dish scrubbies)... superb pod condos>
3. With DSB in the sump, refugium and 80G display (for Jawfish), do I need any
substrate in the 180?
<not for NNR>
I know that bird wrasses do not bury themselves & there will be plenty of LR
for hiding in.
<agreed>
4. I currently have a Remora Pro on my 80G-should I leave it there for
additional skimming beyond the CS8-2?
<yes, please... and alternate cleanings with other unit to help maintain
uninterrupted skimmate production>
5. Which would be better, ozone or UV (or both)?
<I have little or no use for UV on a display tank... but find many benefits
to ozone and a Redox meter on such aquaria>
Thanks, Steve Allen.
<thanks kindly my friend... be chatting soon. Anthony>
A Few Questions, Cont'd
By the way, in reviewing my email to you, I noticed some ambiguity in one of
my questions...
<I'm sure it was unintentional! ;) >
"Asked differently, what surface area and depth (i.e. volume) of sand would
be good for the 125-gal main display? Smaller would be better when considering
space available."
<I wish a magic formula existed which would indicate a specific amount of
sand needed, but too many variables exist. The amount of denitrifying
bacteria increases with volume of sand AND proper food source. The
food source here is directly correlated with whatever livestock you may add to
the mix. Simply put: You'll need to construct your sand bed based on
what you'd like to keep. In a reef, keeping the bio-load light is a
key to success. If you're planning on 1+ pounds of live rock per
gallon, a huge DSB isn't necessary, and it sure isn't pretty to
most. A smaller, remote DSB offers lots of options and serves it's
purpose.>
What I meant was, what volume of sand (DSB) in the sump is recommended to
support the 125-gallon main display.
<If you're going to use the Ecosystem system, the only way you'll
be able to run a deep sand bed is in a refugium. With a 125 Gallon
display, a 20-40 gallon refugium with a 4-6 inch DSB will work well and help to
support a beautiful reef. Good luck! Ryan>
DSB Grain size (11-21-03)
A question about optimal grain size for a DSB - I am starting a 90g reef,
with 20g sump and 45g refugium - I plan for 6-8" DSB for both the tank and
fuge - would you use grain size ranging from 0.2 to 1.2 mm called
"sugar" sand, or 0.5-1.2 mm called "Select" - the select is
more expensive. This is a lot of sand - around 450 lbs.<I would go with the
sugar sand if it saves you money. I don't really see any advantages
in going with the "select". There are a lot of people using
Southdown play ground sand from Home Depot and having good results also. I
would do a search on this at our site: www.wetwebmedia.com. Cody>
Thanks
John
DSB Grain Size II (11-22-03)
Thanks very much. <No problem!> Southdown is not available here. I tried
to get some, but
with shipping it would cost MORE than the "expensive" sand.
I may try using local natural ocean sand, after screening it and washing it.
Our local ocean temp is only 6-8 degrees Celsius - so of course most of the
flora and fauna would not survive at reef temperatures. Any comments here?<If
you use the ocean sand rinse, rinse, and rinse some more! There might be
something on this at our site, www.wetwebmedia.com. Good luck,
Cody.>
Sorting Out A Sandbed Situation...
My current tank is a 55 gallon reef. The tank is about 1 1/2 yrs. old and is
experiencing a major algae/ red slime outbreak. I am about 99% sure this is due
to the nutrient sink I have created with my 2 - 2.5 inch mixed size sand bed. As
luck would have it I will be flooring the room that it sits in and replacing it
with a new tank, stand and larger sump/ refugium. I have plenty
of new Southdown (real cheap here in NJ) as well as the Florida live sand and
(mixed sizes) and aragonite from the existing tank. I was going to use a DSB
but after talking to Jason at AquaC and reading a lot of posts, it seems as
though they are starting to fall out of favor.
<Well, there has been a lot of talk on the hobbyist boards of late regarding
the alleged downsides of deep sand beds. While much research remains to be done
on this topic, I think the benefits of DSBs outweigh any negatives. I get the
feeling that a lot of the negative stuff is put out by people who have had bad
experiences due to lapses in husbandry, improper installation of the sand bed,
and other potential miscues...The DSB concept is quite valid, IMO>
The way I see it I have several choices:
A) 1" Southdown in display with 1" existing live sand in dedicated 8g
'fuge.
B) 4" Southdown in display with 1" existing live sand in dedicated 8g
fuge.
C) 1" existing sand in both display and fuge.
D) 1" Southdown in display with 4-5" existing live sand in dedicated
8g fuge.
I am leaning towards C since I like the look of Southdown Sand and the flexibility
of taking the fuge offline if I want to change to shallow bed, or mud at a later
time. I am starting to think that the most important thing is macro for nutrient
export regardless what bed I use.
<Well, one thing that I feel pretty strongly about is that you need to go 1/2
inch or less, or 3 inches or more. My thinking is that 1 inch is too shallow to
foster denitrification, but too deep to be fully aerobic, which is a potential
recipe for long term problems. If you're inclined to go this route, better to
use a sprinkling of sand in the display, and a 3 inch plus bed in the
sump...Modified Plan "D">
I am looking for any thoughts or suggestions you guys might have. I would just
like to get it right this time around.
<You're on the right track!>
Thanx as always, Ken
<My pleasure Ken...It's good to get feedback from lots of sources here. I
would take anyone's suggestions (including mine) with a grain of salt, taking
into account basic husbandry concepts, an plan your system in a manner that
works best for you! Good luck! Regards, Scott F>
Sandbed Stuff
Thanks Scott F.
<You're welcome!>
I meant to say option D. Anyways, what about 3-4" Southdown in the display
with 4-5" of the existing mixed size live sand /cc for the fuge.
<Ahh...sounds good to me>
Denitrification in the main tank with pod production in the refugium. Would I
need to clean/rinse the existing sand before adding it to the fuge. Would I need
to add a specific detritivore kit? I currently have 3 brittle stars.
<Personally, I would not "clean" the sand, for fear of eliminating
more potentially beneficial life forms. I'd limit additions of detritivores to
the existing brittle stars, and maybe some worms. Again- I'd be hesitant to add
any creatures that could be too disruptive. Possibly contrary to popular
thought, but I don't think that lots of "sand stirring" is either
necessary or desirable, especially in a well-maintained tank>
The existing sand bed is loaded with spaghetti worms and bristle worms that I
can salvage. I was thinking of adding 2 small cukes, about a dozen Nassarius
snails and about 2 dozen of the smaller red leg Mexican hermits to new Southdown
in the display.
<That seems fine to me...Again, I wouldn't disrupt the bed too much, even in
the display>
Also saving some of the existing sand in nylon
bags and using it to seed the display, or is just adding it to the fuge
sufficient for biological activity? Any thought or comments are greatly
appreciated.
Thanx, ken
<Well, Ken, I'd be inclined to just place it in the refugium. Sure, you can
seed the refugium by keeping it in bags, but in my experience, such procedures
don't seem to be necessary. Just dump it in! BTW, for a lot of killer information
on DSBs and refugia, trust me and get a copy of Anthony and Bob's "Reef
Invertebrates" book- exactly what you're looking for...Makes a great
holiday gift! Good luck! Regards, Scott F>
Sugar sized sand?
I have been researching how much it is going to cost me to put a 6" DSB
in my 55g, and I am having a little bit of trouble figuring out what I need to
get. All of the LFSs around here, in SE Wisconsin, have pretty high
prices compared to the places online so I'm probably going to be ordering my
sand online. My issue is this: I am looking for sugar size sand, and most sands
that I have seen on websites list their size in mm. I have seen mixes
with sizes of .18mm-1.2mm and 1mm-4mm. What size in mm would you
recommend/consider to be sugar size?
Thanks-
Luke
<Hi Luke, shipping sand may also become quite expensive, 6in is good, 4-5in
would work as well. It has been a while since i last tried to measure
sugar, but if you stay under 2mm you should be in good shape. This is
a pretty popular topic, lots of FAQs
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/dsbfaqs.htm>
Re: sandbed question
Hello again,
I have a couple of follow-up questions.
1. For future reference, when you have a sandbed in a separate sump is there
a certain size that is appropriate for a 100gal tank?
<Mmm, well, the bigger the better... no less than a fifth the volume of the
main tank...>
Do suggest adding one
of those sand starter kits like the one from inland aquatics that has the
worms and other stuff?
<Generally not... enough critters come in/on the live rock to adequately
inoculate the new substrate>
Do you have to feed the sandbed since it is separate,
because I thought the worms and other stuff in the live sand eat the
detritus. Do you add sand sifters?
<No to both... enough food of different sorts will find its way there... and
almost never a need for sand sifters>
2. For now, do you know if those fluidized filters actually work and if they
are a benefit?
<Do work... but almost never needed... You don't want to overdrive
nitrification... such technology (FB) is for high and variably bio-loaded
systems... like wholesalers, aquaculture facilities... Bob Fenner>
Thanks again,
Brett
DSB OR Expensive Protein Skimmer
Hello Bob
<Hello Antoine>
I have a 280gal FOWLR Tank 60x30x30 with a 11" Vlamingi Tang, 7" Red
Coris Wrasse, 6" Twin Spot Wrasse, 5" Pink Tail Trigger, 16"
Snowflake EEL,
12" Golden Tail EEL, and a newly acquired 18" Leopard Moray. Now what
I'm in
the process of doing is removing the Snowflake and Golden Tail EEL to a 75
gal tank. I think that I will trade my Pink Tail Trigger in at the LFS for a
miniatus grouper or Formosa wrasse since he is always being harassed by the
Vlamingi tang.
<Okay>
Now since I acquired the Leopard moray I'm putting a strain on my
filtration system. Water parameters have moved up Ammonia .1ppm,
Nitrite.2ppm and Nitrate up to 60ppm.
<Yikes... I would forestall feeding till there was/is no ammonia or nitrite
period>
Everything was at zero except for the
Nitrate being around 35ppm. I'm thinking that this is probably going on
because of the undersized skimmer. I ordered and now have in possession
another Turboflotor 1000 that I was going to use on my new 75 gal but now
I'm wondering if I should send it back and get a Euro-Reef CS8-2 (requires
less adjustment correct) for the 280 gal or just add a 20 gal sump DSB with
about 6 inches of fine sand which would be a cheaper way to control my water
parameters and use the turbo-flotor on the 75 gal.
<I would get the bigger, better skimmer for your larger system for sure>
My goal is control
denitrification and have to do less maintenance. I thought about a refugium
but this would require me to cut the Caulerpa back all the time and worry
about it dying on me causing a possible disaster.
<Not a huge concern>
The original Turboflotor did great until I added the leopard moray and
I know as he grows that he will put a greater strain on my system. I just
don't know if the DSB will do as just a good of a job as the $400.00
Skimmer.
<Not... you would need a couple hundred gallon DSB to "do about the same
good">
Another thing is before I only had a half of cup full of dark
skimmate in my collection cup per week and now its every three days so I
know I'm pushing the skimmer to its limit. I have always done maintenance on
the skimmer, weekly water changes, run activated carbon, Chemipure and every
so often PolyFilter pads. There is also 200lbs of rock in the tank that I
think is enough and still allow the fish to have plenty of room to swim
around.
<Much to consider. Bob Fenner>
DSB (and nitrates) Question 8/18/05
Good Morning Crew!
<Andrew>
I've got a question, which might not have a simple answer (What does in
this hobby? ).....
<Don't know... and am afraid to expand on...>
My question lies in the necessary size of a remote DSB in relation to the
"primary" tank for Nitrate control. I've read every (And there are a LOT)
query regarding DSBs on this board, and the info in the Reef Inverts book
by Anthony, and Bob, but I'm still not sure I've gotten what I'm looking
for. I'm in the process of moving my tank, and will be setting up a 72G
bowfront tank, with a 20G sump, and (roughly) a 4.5G HOB CPR Aquafuge for
Pod production/Macroalgae. If I don't go nuts on stocking levels, would a
5-6" DSB in the Sump (Probably 2/3's DSB, partitioned for water inlet from
tank, and the Eheim 1260 return pump) and Refuge be able to control my
Nitrates at or very close to Zero?
<Mmm, will definitely help... only practice can tell how much>
If you need any further information
regarding additional circulation, filtration, etc, let me know. I just hesitate
to add the DSB to the display tank as a 72G primary Aquarium isn't particularly
huge, and I'm not very fond of the 5-6" sand bed look,
<Me neither...>
but if it's necessary, function will prevail over form.
I realize a lot has to do with maintenance, stocking levels, etc. but is
there an effective "rule-of-thumb" ratio of Nitrate-consuming sump/'fuge
size to aquarium size?
<Not as far as I'm aware, or concerned... the bigger the better... but no
minimum, matching value... Just too many other factors to place in a string of
variables in such an equation... foods, feeding, lighting... chemistry...
temperature...>
(I have this really bad feeling you're going to
say there are too many variables to tell)
<Heeeee! It may well be time for you to join our Crew, start answering
queries...>
I'd just prefer to add the DSB
from scratch, instead of stressing the heck out of the livestock by adding
it later should it not be adequate.
<Will be fine... I say, go ahead!>
Thanks for your help with the question, and for the amazing amount of
help and information you provide!
-Andy
<Glad to share. Bob Fenner>
| |
|